Changes to the state pension could be inevitable(Image: Getty)

State pension warning as soaring costs could lead to retirement income changes

The cost of the state pension continues to rise, with policy planners potentially forced to make significant changes to other pension policies

by · NottinghamshireLive

The surging cost of the state pension is prompting warnings that significant changes to other pension policies may be on the horizon. The triple lock has already provided a substantial 8.5 per cent increase to payments following a record 10.1 per cent boost last year, leading to an ever-increasing cost for the state pension.

Policy planners are considering options to make the policy less generous, such as tweaking the triple lock or raising the state pension age. Despite this, Labour has committed to maintaining the triple lock during its current term in office.

If ministers intend to protect the state pension as it stands, other adjustments might be required. Mark Pemberthy, benefits consulting leader at Gallagher, commented: "We need to face up to the financial reality of the affordability of the state pension, but at the same time if we fail to adequately support pensioners in retirement we could risk adding pressure to already overstretched health and social services. Solutions like boosting workplace pension savings through auto-enrolment or making tough fiscal decisions may be necessary."

He further added: "Whatever path is taken, it is vital that any changes are both fair and sustainable for current and future generations. The current auto-enrolment rules set out that at least eight per cent of a worker's salary has to go into a workplace pension. This is often set up so an employee pays in five per cent while the employer pays three per cent", reports the Liverpool Echo.

Mr Pemberthy highlighted that the state pension issue transcends the current Government's tenure. He emphasised: "This problem cannot be solved by simply looking at the typical five-year political horizon. We encourage the government to undertake a comprehensive independent review of retirement planning to establish clear principles for a fair and sustainable long-term plan for both state and private pensions, enabling everyone to plan for their future with confidence."

In attempts to make the state pension more adaptable, Aegon, the wealth management group, has previously suggested the option for people to access their state pension three years before reaching the official age, albeit at a lower rate.

Aegon's pensions director Steven Cameron advocates for the inclusion of "flexible pension options" in the forthcoming government pensions review. He said: "We hope that the ongoing pension investment review will take into account any potential changes to the state pension age alongside any changes to private pensions, as our recent Second 50 research shows 96 per cent of workers expect to rely on state pension support in retirement."

There is ongoing debate regarding a potential increase in the state pension age to 70, with experts in the field offering varied perspectives. Mr Cameron commented: "While we don't expect the Government to implement further changes to the state pension age for a couple of decades, another review is anticipated soon, focusing on increasing the age to 67 and 68. We'd be surprised if the state pension age increased by more than a year at a time, and we strongly support giving people at least 10 years' notice to plan accordingly."

He added: "The higher the state pension age, the greater the need for options to take it earlier at a reduced level to ensure financial fairness. Increasing the state pension age to 70 might save the Government money, but it risks sidelining those unable to work into their late 60s."