Model captures energy return on global agriculture investment

by

Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

proofread

5-year average energy return on energy investment (EROEI) for different product groups in the period 2015–2019. Credit: Rasul et al.

A primary output of agriculture is food, an energy source for the human body. But agriculture also requires energy inputs.

Kajwan Rasul and colleagues calculated the global energy return on investment for agriculture over time from 1995 to 2019. The authors constructed a model using two existing models, one that captures the energy use of agriculture and food processing and another that captures flows of agricultural commodities. The work is published in the journal PNAS Nexus.

The authors find that the return on energy investment for global agriculture has increased from .68 to .91 over the study period. However, the ratio seems to have plateaued since around 2014.

Despite the overall improvement in efficiency, the return on investment is still less than one, indicating that more energy is required to grow food than what food provides in the form of calories. This status reflects the use of fossil fuels, especially in food processing, which accounts for 40% of the total energy use in the global agrifood system.

  • 5-year average energy return on energy investment (EROEI) for different product groups in the period 2015–2019. Credit: Rasul et al.
  • 5-year average energy return on energy investment (EROEI) for different UN regions in the period 2015–2019. Credit: Rasul et al.

Animal-based products are particularly energy-hungry, accounting for 60% of the energy used in the global agrifood system but providing just 18% of the calories. However, more than two-thirds of people live in regions where the energy return on investment is higher than one, such as Western, Central, and Eastern Africa or Eastern, Southern, and South-eastern Asia.

According to the authors, reducing the energy required to grow food helps communities ensure food security in the face of an unstable energy supply and helps reduce the environmental impacts of feeding humanity.

More information: Kajwan Rasul et al, Energy input and food output: The energy imbalance across regional agrifood systems, PNAS Nexus (2024). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae524. academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/art … 3/12/pgae524/7919164

Journal information: PNAS Nexus

Provided by PNAS Nexus