Government 'knew weeks ago' Southport suspect may face terror charges

Senior government figures knew 'weeks ago' that Southport triple murder suspect Axel Rudakubuna could face terror charges, it was claimed today.

Downing Street has denied accusations of a 'cover up' over details of the allegations, denying that facts had been held back. 

As the row rages, the BBC has reported that the most senior figures in government first became aware of the possibility of new charges against Rudakubuna in the past few weeks

In order to charge a suspect under the Biological Weapons Act, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must obtain consent from the attorney general or solicitor general. 

That is said to have been requested a few weeks ago. The government maintains that both the charging decision and timeline were a matter for the CPS. 

Rudakubuna, 18, is due in court today charged with charged with producing the poison ricin and possessing a military study of an al-Qaeda training manual. 

He is already charged with the murders of Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine, seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe and Bebe King, six at a Taylor Swift dance class on July 29 as well as ten attempted murders and possession of a knife. 

The killings sparked large scale riots, fuelled by misinformation on social media, in towns and cities across the UK. 

Yesterday, senior Tories demanded Keir Starmer reveals what he knew and when.

Conservative leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick said he was 'seriously concerned that facts may have been withheld from the public', while rival Kemi Badenoch added that there are 'serious questions to be asked' of authorities.

No 10 says any suggestion of them withholding information is 'not correct', adding that the focus should remain with the victims of the attack.

Police repeatedly insisted at the time that the holiday camp bloodbath in Hart Street, Southport was not being treated as terror-related. 

The authorities insisted yesterday that the events had still not been declared a terrorist incident because no motive had been established. 

Downing Street denied the Government had been involved in the timing of the charging announcement.

A spokeswoman said: 'No, charging decisions and when those are made are for the CPS.'

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper warned against speculating about the case, adding: 'The most important thing is to get justice for Bebe, Alice and Elsie and their heartbroken families, and all those affected by the attack, and nobody should put that at risk.'

The latest charges came after searches of Rudakubana's home in Banks, Lancashire, Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said at a press conference on Tuesday.

The alleged terror offence relates to a PDF file entitled Military Studies In The Jihad Against The Tyrants, The Al Qaeda Training Manual.

Searches were carried out in the days after the attack, although it was not confirmed when the ricin was found.

According to the charges, authorised by the CPS yesterday, the toxin was allegedly produced on or before July 29, and Rudakubana was charged with possessing the document between August 29 2021 and July 30 2024.

Rudakubana is alleged to have entered the school holiday dance class at a small business park in Southport shortly before midday on July 29.

The day after the attack, thousands of people turned out for a peaceful vigil in the town but later a separate protest erupted into violence outside a mosque in the town.

In the following week, protests took place in dozens of towns and cities across the country and descended into violence and rioting, with asylum centre hotels in particular targeted.

More than 1,000 arrests have since been made and hundreds of people have been charged and jailed.

A provisional trial date for Rudakubana has been set for January next year.

Mr Jenrick said last night: 'The Government and authorities told us for months they were not treating this as a terrorist incident,' the former immigration minister said. 

'This atrocity was of immense public concern. The public had a right to know the truth straight away.

'Any suggestion of a cover-up will permanently damage public trust in whether we're being told the truth about crime in our country.

'Keir Starmer must urgently explain to the country what he knew about the Southport attack and when he learned it.

'Across the board the hard reality of mass migration is being covered up. We need the truth - and we need to change.'

Rudakubana was born in Cardiff to Rwandan parents and moved to the Southport area in 2013. He was living in Banks, Lancashire, at the time of the attack.

Ms Badenoch said there are 'serious questions to be asked' of the authorities.

She tweeted: 'After the Southport murders and the ensuing protests and riots, some people asked me why I wasn't commenting. This is why. Too many on all sides rush to conclusions before all the facts are clear.

'As more information emerges, it is quite clear that there are serious questions to be asked of the police, the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] and also of Keir Starmer's response to the whole situation. Parliament is the right place for this to happen.

'While we must abide by the rules of contempt of court and not prejudice this case it is important that there is appropriate scrutiny.'

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, posted a video on Twitter in which he said: 'In the wake of the horrific murder of those three girls in Southport in July of this year, I asked some questions saying 'please tell us the truth - stop the online speculation'.

'Well it has taken a long time to find out more about the individual. He has now been charged, believe it or not, under the Biological Weapons Act because the police have [allegedly] found Ricin in his home.

Read More

Robert Jenrick says he is 'seriously concerned facts may have been withheld from the public'

'He has been charged under the Terrorism Act, alleged to have downloaded Al-Qaeda terrorist materials.

'But the murder of the girls, and the serious injury of the others, that is still being treated as a non-terror incident because they don't know what the motives were.

'We've also been told this afternoon there are other facts that we don't yet know because the Crown Prosecution Service say they will come out in good time in court and are not to be discussed now.

'So that's alright then? That all makes sense to you, doesn't it? Yes, absolutely.'

Speaking at the press conference, chief constable Serena Kennedy, said: 'I would strongly advise everyone to avoid speculation about the motivation in this case.

'The criminal proceedings against Axel Rudakubana are live and he has a right to a fair trial.

'It is extremely important that there is no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online that could prejudice these procedures.'

And government sources have blasted the comments made by Jenrick and Badenoch, branding the Tory hopefuls 'simply despicable'.

One told The Times: 'What these comments show is that — whichever candidate wins the Tory leadership — a party which used to stand for law and order, and respect for the police, is headed for a future built on conspiracy theories and the undermining of public faith in our institutions and public servants. 

'In the best of circumstances, that lurch into the politics of division and distrust would be hugely depressing, but to do it on the back of the heartbreaking losses in Southport is simply despicable.'

Downing Street said the Prime Minister's thoughts remain with the families of the Southport attack victims, saying suggestions facts had been withheld were 'not correct'.

A No 10 spokeswoman said: 'The Government is focused on ensuring the families and all those affected receive justice, and first and foremost the Prime Minister's thoughts are with those families and the local community. His thoughts remain firmly with them.'

Downing Street denied the Government had been involved in decision-making about the timing of an announcement about charges against the Southport attack suspect.

Asked if there was any Government involvement in decisions on the timing, a No 10 spokeswoman said: 'No, charging decisions and when those are made are for the CPS.'

She also said it was 'not correct' to say the Government had been involved in withholding facts from the public.

The spokeswoman added: 'Charging decisions are independently made by the CPS and I would point you to the CPS' statement and statements from the police.'