Madras High Court orders report on road repair works from Papanasam to Agasthiyar Falls in Ambasamudram.

Kerala High Court mandates sensitisation classes for investigating officers to ensure proper procedural requirements in criminal cases.

The Supreme Court is set to deliver on Tuesday its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the Allahabad High Court ruling which had struck down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act

Supreme Court to decide if resources created by individual labor are community resources, impacting private property rights.

Supreme Court to deliver verdict on legality of Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004, regulating madrasa education.

The Supreme Court in April said the Constitution intended to bring about a 'sense of social transformation' and it would be 'dangerous' to say that private property of an individual cannot be regarded as material resources of community and taken over by state authorities to subserve common good.

The top court had on April 5 stayed the high court verdict, saying the issues raised in seven petitions against the verdict merited 'closer reflection'.

A nine-judge Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday in a majority verdict held that not all private resources of the individuals are material resources of the community that the government can take over to subserve a common good.

A nine-judge bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, however, said states can stake claim over private properties in certain cases.

Supreme Court held that the only unconstitutional part of the Madrasa Act in relation to its authority to grant 'fazil' and 'kamil' degrees, which is in conflict with the UGC Act.

The high court erred in holding that the law was violative of the principle of secularism, said a bench comprising Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

The Uttar Pradesh government implemented the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act in 2004. However, the Allahabad High Court declared this Act unconstitutional. The decision made by the High Court was later challenged in the Supreme Court.

Thalassery Sessions Court in Kerala reserves judgment on bail plea of P.P. Divya, facing abetment of suicide charges, amid intense arguments.