Enhancing hurricane forecasts: Simulations reveal reducing estimates of atmospheric friction improves storm predictions
by Kimberly Mann BruchThis article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
Hurricanes and other extreme weather events are expensive in lives and money. From 1980 to 2023, weather and climate disasters caused about $2.6 trillion in damages in the U.S., according to NOAA estimates. In 2022 alone, the U.S. experienced 18 disasters individually costing $1 billion or more. Worse, U.S. hurricanes from 2000 to 2021 took almost 2,000 lives. As climate change continues to intensify these storms, accurate forecasting becomes ever more crucial.
"Enhanced hurricane predictions can potentially save millions of dollars and many lives by providing more precise forecasts of hurricane winds and floods. [A better understanding of these storms] holds promise for better evacuation planning but also has the potential to inform emergency services with the forecasts needed to respond more effectively," says Mostafa Momen, University of Houston.
University of Houston graduate student Md Murad Hossain Khondaker, working with his advisor Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Mostafa Momen, wanted to understand better how atmospheric friction affects storm strength and numerical predictions.
To study this problem, the team got access to Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center's (PSC) supercomputer, Bridges-2. They got time on the system through an allocation from ACCESS, the NSF's network of supercomputing resources, in which PSC is a leading member.
At the core of the team's research is a novel approach to understanding how hurricanes function. While the power of the sun in low latitudes can pump energy into storms, making them more intense, the atmosphere itself resists through friction. But the extent of this friction, and its effect on storm power, is poorly understood. Khondaker wondered what changing the assumed friction, or diffusion, would do to the predictions.
The scale and complexity of this research required significant computational resources to process the vast datasets involved. Bridges-2 was instrumental, providing more than 300,000 CPU-core hours as well as the performance of its 16 higher-RAM "regular memory" nodes. With 512 gigabytes of RAM apiece, each of these nodes has eight times as much memory as a high-end laptop.
"Simulating 17 days of Hurricane Irma with eight-kilometer horizontal resolution took about 22 hours using 128 processors. By conducting hydrological simulations, we showed that this new adjustment also improves flood forecasts in hurricane-prone regions. The implications of these findings are far-reaching, as recent hurricanes like Katrina, Harvey, and Maria caused over $400 billion in total adjusted costs, according to the NOAA estimates," says Momen.
Reducing the diffusion in their Bridges-2 simulations, the researchers made a startling discovery. The adjusted computer models significantly improved the accuracy of hurricane intensity forecasts. This improvement also extended to predicting hurricane-induced rainfall, a critical factor in anticipating flood risks in vulnerable areas.
The adjusted model was able to make hurricane intensity forecasts more accurate by up to 40 percent compared with the default weather models. Another surprising finding was that more intense hurricanes do not necessarily lead to more total rainfall but rather more localized and severe precipitation. This insight is particularly relevant for urban areas, where concentrated rainfall can lead to catastrophic flooding, as seen during Hurricane Harvey in Houston.
The University of Houston team published their results in the Journal of Hydrometeorology in August 2024.
More information: Md Murad Hossain Khondaker et al, Improving Hurricane Intensity and Streamflow Forecasts in Coupled Hydrometeorological Simulations by Analyzing Precipitation and Boundary Layer Schemes, Journal of Hydrometeorology (2024). DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-23-0153.1
Provided by Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center